|
|
|
| Child Hearsay |
|
Charles Causey v. State,
No. F-2006-991 (Okl.Cr., June 29, 2007) (unpublished): 1. Vouching; 2. Child Hearsay: This is another Lewd Molestation case REVERSED and remanded for new trial on the basis of several errors: 1) failure of the trial court to hold a hearing and make specific findings on the reliability of child hearsay; 2) improper vouching (State witness and prosecutor told the jury that the complaining witness was telling the truth); and 3) failure to give the 85% instruction. Judge Gary L. Brock (McCurtain County).
|
|
|
|
