(with special thanks to Mark Hoover, OIDS, for contributing regularly)

 

“I have lived my life, and I have fought my battles, not against the weak and the poor—anybody can do that—but against power, against injustice, against oppression, and I have asked no odds from them, and I never shall.”—-Clarence S. Darrow, Attorney for the Damned 491, 497 (Arthur Weinberg ed. 1957).

 

 

No new cases.

 

 

The Estate of Clayton Lockett v. Governor Mary Fallin, No. 15-6134 (10^th Cir., November 15, 2016) (Published) (Gorsuch, Phillips & Moritz) (W.D. Okla., Hon. Joe Heaton): Civil Rights: This is a lengthy opinion affirming the dismissal of a civil rights action against the State by the estate of Clayton Lockett, who was the death row inmate subjected to the botched execution. The majority held that there was no violation of the Eighth Amendment. Judge Moritz concurred, but chastised the majority for deciding constitutional issues raised in the case.

United States v. Jeremy Gilmore, No. 15-3114 (10^th Cir., November 15, 2016) (Published) (Holmes, Seymour & Phillips): Federal Sentencing Guidelines (Sentence Modification): Denial of a motion to reduce sentence based upon a retroactive sentencing amendment is affirmed because the term of imprisonment was not “based on” a guidelines sentencing range.

United States v. Eldon L. Boisseau, No. 15-3294 (10^th Cir., November 16, 2016) (Published) (Kelly, Hartz & Matheson): Sufficiency (Tax Evasion); Taxes: Lawyer out of Wichita convicted at a bench trial of tax evasion has conviction affirmed over his claims relating to sufficiency.

 

 

“Only Supreme Court justices and schoolchildren are expected to and do take the entire summer off.” –Chief Justice John Roberts (statement made while he served as a lawyer in the Reagan Administration).

 

No new cases.

 

 

United States v. Lydia Vasquez, No. 15-41168 (5^th Cir., October 5, 2016): Federal Sentencing Guidelines (Fictitious Minor): Vasquez was convicted of enticing and coercing an individual to engage in unlawful sexual activity, and on appeal she challenged an eight-level enhancement for an offense involving a minor under the age of 12 when she knew the minor was fictitious because made it up. The panel held that the enhancement does not apply when the accused invents and offers a fictitious minor under twelve years of age to entice another person to engage in unlawful sexual activity.

United States v. Anthony Ryan Gonzales, No. 15-50762 (5^th Cir., November 2, 2016): Jury Instructions; Sufficiency: Interesting case analyzing the use of special jury questions in a drug conspiracy/murder/firearms case. The panel held that the special questions (to which neither party objected) were acceptable, but that once asked, the answers must be considered when evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence.

United States v. Courtland Lenard Turner, No. 15-50788 (5^th Cir., October 13, 2016): Search and Seizure (Computers/Electronic): As the panel stated it, the central issue in this case is whether a law enforcement officer’s scanning of the magnetic strip on the back of a gift card is a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. The panel joined two other circuits in holding that it is not.

United States v. Tony Jefferson Browne, No. 14-1798 (3^rd Cir., August 25, 2016): Evidence (Facebook; Authentication): This case deals with authentication issues under Rule 901 and 902 of Facebook chats. The panel disagreed with the Government that the chats were self-authenticating as business records, but held that the trial record reflected sufficient evidence to link Browne to the chats which satisfied the Government’s authentication burden under Rule 901.

United States v. Fahd Hussain, No. 14-4425-cr (2^nd Cir., August 31, 2016): Search and Seizure (Traffic Stops; Reasonable Suspicion): Denial of suppression motion is reversed in this traffic stop case because the facts did not support a full protective search of the passenger compartment of the vehicle.

 

 

None reported.

 

 

OSP: The McAlester News follows-up on a profile of OSP.

WHITE HAT TO BLACK HAT: The Norman Transcript did a story about attorney Zack Simmons, who transitioned from the District Attorney’s Office to criminal defense.

BROKEN SYSTEM: Multi-part series by NewsOK on the state of county jails in Oklahoma.

MURALS: The murals at the Garfield County courthouse have been restored.

REFORM: Gov. Fallin appears committed to criminal justice reform.

PANHANDLERS: Oklahoma City police have been busy handing out tickets to homeless panhandlers at N.E. 23^rd and Santa Fe. Homeless panhandlers can be a problem that needs to be addressed, but something bothers me about the police dealing with it in this way. It just seems like piling on defenseless people.

RAPE CHARGE: A female food service supervisor at Lawton Correctional Facility has been charged with rape after it became apparent that she had an affair with an inmate. Rape is such a strong word for this offense. The legislature should call this something else if it wants to punish people who do this.

IMMIGRATION: Interesting article about the impact of the 2007 immigration bill in Oklahoma, one of the most strict in the country.

FORFEITURE CONTROVERSY: Attorney Winston Connor won a forfeiture action for a client accused of animal cruelty—in the form of having the animals returned to the client—but now faces a significant backlash from the public.

SHERIFF HONORED: The Dewey County Sheriff has been honored for his actions in ending the killing spree of Michael Dale Vance. At the ceremony, Lt. Gov. Todd Lamb said this: “Your actions that night protected my family in Oklahoma City, protected my family in Enid… because of your actions and activity in intervening. We found the scumbag and other brothers and sisters in law enforcement eliminated the life of that scumbag because of your actions earlier on in that day.”

HOLTZCLAW BILLBOARD: Friends and family of former police officer Daniel Holtzclaw are raising questions about his guilt by using billboards.

TEXTING LAW: The OU Daily reports that police in Norman often write tickets for “failure to devote full time and attention” rather than tickets for violating the recently enacted anti-texting law.

POLYGRAPHS: Interesting article about polygraphs. Do they work? No.

DRUG COURT: Interesting video on YouTube about the Cleveland County Drug Court, and the efficacy of the program.

 

WACKY CRIME

DON’TS: Life lessons from the courthouse, for example, it is not a good idea to show up at a courthouse when you have outstanding warrants…and meth…which you are using.

DARWIN: A suspect fleeing police in Oklahoma City managed to run himself over with his own car, but survived.

 

 

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2016: Tulsa County Bar Association annual HODGEPODGE XXVII, moderated by Paul Brunton and Barry Derryberry. Lots of good speakers at this one!

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2016: The OCDLA presents a seminar on federal and state racketeering.

 

SUBSCRIPTIONS AND SUBMISSIONS: To subscribe to the Oklahoma Criminal Defense Weekly just send an e-mail to James L. Hankins at jameshankins@ocdw.com and include the e- mail address to which you want the issues to be delivered. I am sending out the issues for free now to whoever wants to receive them. Submissions of articles, war stories, letters, victory stories, comments or questions can be sent to Mr. Hankins via e-mail or you can contact him by phone at 405.753.4150, by fax at 405.445.4956, or by regular mail at James L. Hankins, TIMBERBROOKE BUSINESS CENTER, 929 N.W. 164^th St., Edmond, OK 73013.

OKLAHOMA CRIMINAL DEFENSE WEEKLY

ABOUT THE OCDW: The Oklahoma Criminal Defense Weekly is compiled, maintained, edited and distributed weekly by attorney James L. Hankins. Archived issues can be obtained by contacting Mr. Hankins directly, although some of them are on the web site at www.ocdw.com. OCDW accepts no money from sponsors. Mr. Hankins is solely responsible for its content. The OCDW web site is maintained by Spark Line.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT & DISCLAIMER: ©2005-2016 by James L. Hankins. All rights reserved. OCDW hereby grants free use of these materials for any non-commercial purpose provided that proper credit to the OCDW is given. In the event that copyrighted works are included in an edition of the OCDW such works may not be reproduced without the consent of the copyright holder because under federal law the OCDW has no authority to allow the reproduction of the intellectual property of others. For purposes that go beyond “fair use” of the copyrighted material under federal law, the permission of the copyright holder must be obtained. If you are a copyright holder and object to any portion of an issue of the OCDW, please contact the publisher, James L. Hankins, at the contact information above (located under the SUBSCRIPTIONS AND SUBMISSIONS section). Finally, the materials presented in this newsletter are for informational purposes only, and are not, nor intended to be, legal advice or to create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult an experienced attorney licensed in your jurisdiction for legal advice applicable to the specific facts of your case. Cases are summarized in each weekly issue as they are issued and filed by the respective court, and are thus subject to being withdrawn, corrected, vacated, and/or modified or reversed without notice. Always conduct your own research!

UNSUBSCRIBE

If you have received this e-mail in error, or no longer wish to receive the weekly newsletter, simply reply to the message, or send a new message, to jameshankins@ocdw.com and type in “UNSUBSCRIBE” in the subject line, along with your name and e-mail address and you will be taken off the mailing list.