| ||||||
Oklahoma Daniel Hawkes Fears v. State, No. F-2004-1279 (Okl.Cr., January 26, 2007): This is an unpublished order denying the State's petition for rehearing. Fears was convicted by jury of multiple counts, including two counts of Murder in the First Degree, as the result of a crime spree in Sequoyah County. The main opinion reversed the convictions and remanded with instructions to enter a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. Although rehearing was denied, the opinion reveals a very contentious issue. Judges Lumpkin and A. Johnson dissented, with Judge A. Johnson pointing out quite correctly the absurdity of deciding a case of first impression that purports to overrule existing law but designating the opinion as not for publication. Tenth Circuit United States v. Gaines, No. 06-7043 (10th Cir., January 30, 2007) (Unpublished): Remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of competency to enter a guilty plea. This case is from the Eastern District of Oklahoma. The BOP issued a letter to the Court questioning the credibility and accuracy of the psychological evaluation performed by Dr. Thomas Patenaude. The District Court took no action, but the Circuit remanded for an evidentiary hearing on the issue. No new cases from the Court last week. United States v. Knellinger, No. 3:06cr126 (E.D. Va., January 25, 2007): Child Porn: In this federal child porn case, the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act requires that the child pornography remain in the custody of the United States or the Court, so long as the defendant has "ample opportunity for inspection, viewing, and examination" of the evidence at a Government facility. Knellinger requested a mirror image copy of his hard drive and the government refused. The Court held that Knellinger was entitled to a mirror image copy for use by his experts because of the testimony that it would not be practical for the experts to move all their equipment to a government facility.
STATES vs. FEDS: The federal Real ID Act (to take effect in 2008) places requirements on the states in issuing IDs, including running the names through a national immigration database. The states do not seem too thrilled with this idea and the legislatures of several states have passed resolutions refusing to implement the act. HERE is another article on this topic. SUBMISSIONS: Submit articles, war stories, letters to the editor, victory stories, comments, critiques and questions via e-mail to jameshankins@ocdw.com, by phone 405.232.1988, by fax to 405.272.9859, or by regular mail to James L. Hankins, 119 N. Robinson Ave, Ste 320, Oklahoma City, OK 73102. | ||||||
|
ABOUT THE OCDW: The Oklahoma Criminal Defense Weekly is compiled, maintained, edited and distributed weekly by attorney James L. Hankins. Archived issues are available at www.ocdw.com. OCDW accepts no money from sponsors and Mr. Hankins is solely responsible for its content. OCDW is designed by Patty Hankins and FullPace Web Solutions. COPYRIGHT STATEMENT & DISCLAIMER: © 2007 by James L. Hankins. All rights reserved. OCDW hereby grants free use of these materials for any non-commercial purpose provided that proper credit to the OCDW is given. In the event that copyrighted works are included in an edition of the OCDW such works may not be reproduced without the consent of the copyright holder because under federal law the OCDW has no authority to allow the reproduction of the intellectual property of others. For purposes that go beyond "fair use" of the copyrighted material under federal law, the permission of the copyright holder must be obtained. If you are a copyright holder and object to any portion of an issue of the OCDW please contact the publisher, James L. Hankins, at the contact information above (located in the paragraph titled "SUBMISSIONS"). Finally, the materials presented in this newsletter are for informational purposes only, and are not, nor intended to be, legal advice or to create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult an experienced attorney for legal advice applicable to the specific facts of your case. Cases are summarized as they are issued by the respective court and are subject to being withdrawn, corrected, vacated, or modified without notice. Always do your own research! |
||||||
|
| ||||||